Christin and Davis's criminal partnership
Call Me YoursChristin and Davis’s criminal partnership is built on shared resentment, coordinated deception, and a willingness to use violence to acquire property. When they approach Jamie Cooper as new neighbors, their contrasting mannerisms—Christin’s practiced warmth and Davis’s coldness—offer an early glimpse of the roles they play in a scheme that has been years in the making.
Partnership and Cover Identity
Christin and Davis present themselves to Jamie as neighbors shortly after he moves into the mansion. Christin introduces herself as someone commonly called Chris and identifies Davis as her boyfriend. The introduction makes their relationship seem ordinary, but the pair already know Jamie’s family history: Davis recalls that Jamie’s uncle had dismissed them as lowlifes when they tried to befriend him. They turn that insult into a shared justification for taking from people they consider undeserving of their advantages.
Their public personas are complementary rather than identical. Christin initially appears warm and charming, while Davis seems displeased to be there. Once Jamie is in their power, however, Christin joins the coercion instead of maintaining a benign façade: she helps restrain him and later threatens him when he refuses to cooperate. Davis supplies the weapon and directs the questions about the mansion deed. Their partnership therefore works through coordinated roles, with each able to shift from social approach to overt intimidation.
The pair’s attempt to take the mansion is not an improvised response to Jamie’s arrival. Davis says they have watched the house since the previous owner died and rebukes Christin for acting before they had waited a few more days. Their target is the property’s deed, which they believe will let them take control of the mansion. When Jamie explains that the genuine deed is with an attorney, Davis proposes having a false deed created and forcing Jamie to sign it before killing him. Christin supports the plan, slapping Jamie when he objects and threatening to make him sign by force.
Their account of an earlier crime exposes how far their methods extend beyond intimidation. Davis tells Jamie that he befriended a man at his favorite club, slipped something into the man’s drink to make him unstable, followed him home, and set the house on fire after he had gone to bed. Davis says the man, Larry, is dead, then produces a neatly folded paper as the new deed he wants Jamie to sign. The sequence makes the partnership’s pattern plain: gain access through apparent friendliness, incapacitate the target, destroy or remove the obstacle, and use forged paperwork to convert violence into a claim over property.
Christin and Davis also try to manufacture a new identity for Jamie rather than merely compel a signature. They tell him that his name is Chris Davis, that they are his parents, and that he is sixteen and therefore cannot be responsible for the property until he turns eighteen. This imposed story contradicts Jamie’s actual circumstances: he is eighteen, has just moved into the mansion, and is awaiting an appointment with his uncle’s lawyer. The false identity is part of their attempt to keep him alive only while he remains useful and compliant, binding their property fraud to captivity and coercive control.
Coordination and Friction
The partnership is close but not frictionless. Davis briefly tries to stop Christin when her threats against Jamie Cooper escalate, but she rejects his intervention, insisting that years of planning and waiting have brought them to their only chance to change their lives. Her refusal shows that their shared objective does not mean identical judgment about how to pursue it: Davis can urge restraint, while Christin treats Jamie’s resistance as an obstacle to be broken. Their cooperation persists because neither abandons the scheme, even when they disagree over its immediate handling.
Their assumed identities add an unsettling verbal echo to the fraud. Christin introduces herself as someone commonly called Chris; later, she and Davis tell Jamie that he is Chris Davis, their son. The same name moves from Christin’s social cover into the identity they impose on their captive, as the couple’s performance of ordinary neighbors gives way to a manufactured family relationship. That shift makes their partnership more than a plan to seize a deed: together they control the story Jamie is allowed to inhabit, using the false parent-child bond to support his confinement and their claim to the mansion.
The Capture as a Joint Operation
The partnership becomes physical when Jamie Cooper’s new neighbors turn a social visit into an ambush. Christin’s warmth and Davis’s hostility have already made them an oddly mismatched pair; at the mansion, Davis’s revelation about the insult from Jamie’s uncle gives their visit a grievance to disguise their intent. Jamie’s sight blurs, his head spins, and the wineglass slips from his hand and breaks. Davis draws a gun and asks Christin for rope; she has it ready, nudges Jamie onto the sofa, and ties his hands and legs. The sequence shows their complementary roles in action: Davis brings the weapon and directs the confrontation, while Christin moves swiftly from neighborly charm to the practical work of restraint.
Their cooperation persists even when their temperaments pull in different directions. Davis objects when Christin’s threats intensify, but she insists that they have planned and waited for years and will not let Jamie interfere with their chance to change their lives. Her anger does not dissolve the alliance; it makes its terms clearer. Davis may urge patience, yet he remains part of the scheme, while Christin treats the captive’s refusal as something force can overcome. Together they transform an inherited property dispute into a coordinated operation of surveillance, abduction, intimidation, and attempted fraud.
Violence and the Limits of Their Alliance
Christin’s threat to cut off Jamie Cooper’s fingers and toes makes explicit the violence she is prepared to use to secure the deed. Davis tries to check her, but she refuses to let him slow the plan; she taps Jamie’s shoulder as she demands his cooperation. Their partnership can contain disagreement about timing and force, but it does not produce a boundary either will defend on Jamie’s behalf. Davis remains involved as Christin escalates, and she remains committed to the scheme he has devised.
The couple’s alliance extends beyond the mechanics of the property fraud: it depends on making coercion look like a legitimate family arrangement. Their imposed story gives Jamie a different name, age, and set of parents, while the threat of death hangs over his refusal to comply. In the novel’s wider pattern of schemes aimed at wealth and property, Christin and Davis turn a claim to inheritance into both a criminal operation and an assault on Jamie’s identity. The partnership is therefore defined not only by what they intend to take, but by their shared effort to control the person whose signature they need.